top of page

A Man's Search For Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl

  • Writer: Daniel Foster
    Daniel Foster
  • Apr 3
  • 3 min read

"Why do you not commit suicide?"


This jarring question, posed by Viktor E. Frankl to his despairing patients, cuts to the heart of Man's Search for Meaning. In the ruins of Nazi concentration camps—where starvation, cruelty, and death were omnipresent—Frankl arrived at a radical conclusion: those who could answer this question, who could name a reason to endure, were the ones who survived. His memoir is not merely an account of unimaginable suffering, but a philosophical treatise on how meaning persists even in the abyss.


Frankl's observations in Auschwitz revealed a chilling psychological evolution among prisoners. Initial shock and delusion ("the condemned man... gets the illusion that he might be reprieved") gave way to apathy—a numbing "emotional death" that served as armor against relentless brutality. Yet within this descent, something remarkable emerged: those who retained a thread of meaning—through memory, art, or fleeting kindness—found reservoirs of strength invisible to their captors.

"We who lived in concentration camps can remember the men who walked through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread... they offer sufficient proof that everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude."

This "freedom" became the cornerstone of Frankl's logotherapy, which posits that meaning is not a luxury but a lifeline. He identifies three paths to discover it:

  1. Creation – Through work or deeds (e.g., the artist sketching on stolen paper, the scientist clinging to unsolved equations).

  2. Connection – By loving another ("the salvation of man is through love") or experiencing beauty ("How beautiful the world could be").

  3. Attitude – In suffering itself, by reframing it as a test of one’s dignity ("an honorable way").

Frankl’s own survival hinged on this triad. Amidst degradation, he envisioned his wife’s face, transcribed lost manuscripts in his mind, and resolved to bear witness—transforming pain into purpose.


Frankl rejects cheap consolation. His "tragic optimism" (from the Latin optimum) acknowledges life’s inherent cruelty while insisting that human potential flourishes precisely because of—not despite—adversity. This philosophy demands:

  1. Turning suffering into achievement – The prisoner who comforts others; the survivor who writes a memoir.

  2. Growing from guilt – Unlike Freudian fixation, Frankl urges repentance as a catalyst ("change oneself for the better").

  3. Acting urgently – Mortality’s shadow ("life’s transitoriness") sharpens our responsibility to act now.

"He who has a why to live can bear almost any how." (Nietzsche)

This ethos dismantles victimhood. Even in the gas chambers, Frankl argues, one could choose defiance—not of death, but of despair.


Frankl warns against moral laziness. The Capos—prisoners who collaborated with Nazis—were not monsters by nature but humans who abdicated choice ("No man should judge unless he asks himself... whether he might not have done the same"). Conversely, moments of grace ("human kindness... in all groups") revealed that evil is not inevitable but elected.


In an era of comfort and existential drift, Frankl’s question lingers: What stops you from giving up? Is it your work? Your child’s laughter? The book you’ve yet to write? Logotherapy rejects passive happiness, demanding we forge meaning through action and attitude.

"Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems."

Frankl’s legacy is a compass for navigating suffering—not with blind hope, but with the clarity that to suffer meaningfully is to triumph. His answer to suicide’s specter? Because I have something left to give.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page